US: FDA rejects call to remove BPA from food packaging

By Michelle Russell | 3 April 2012

BPA is a commonly used additive in food packaging

BPA is a commonly used additive in food packaging

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has rejected a petition by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) calling for the elimination of bisphenol A (BPA) in food packaging in the US.

The US environmental action group petitioned the FDA in 2008 to eliminate BPA from all food packaging. It subsequently sued the FDA in 2011 when the agency "failed to respond", asking the US District Court for the Southern District of New York to "compel the agency to respond".

The court issued a consent decree requiring the FDA to make a final decision on the petition by 31 March, to which the agency has now responded, stating that BPA, at current levels of exposure, is safe for use in food packaging.

BPA, a commonly used additive in food packaging, mimics human oestrogen and is thought by some health advocates to be harmful to health, while others maintain that it is perfectly safe.

In rejecting the petition from the NRDC, the agency said it was not making a final determination on BPA and that it is continuing to consider the low dose toxicity studies of BPA as well as other recent studies related to the chemical.

Commenting on the decision, Dr. Sarah Janssen, senior scientist in the public health programme at the NRDC said BPA is "a toxic chemical that has no place in our food supply".

"We believe FDA made the wrong call. The agency has failed to protect our health and safety in the face of scientific studies that continue to raise disturbing questions about the long-term effects of BPA exposures, especially in foetuses, babies and young children," she added.

"The FDA is out-of-step with scientific and medical research. This illustrates the need for a major overhaul of how the government protects us against dangerous chemicals."

A number of manufacturers in the US have been looking at a shift to BPA-free cans, with Campbell Soup Co making the move last month. A report published by advocacy group Breast Cancer Fund in September last year found the company's soup to have some of the highest BPA levels among a variety of canned foods it tested.

Sectors: Food safety

View next/previous articles

Currently reading -

US: FDA rejects call to remove BPA from food packaging

There are currently no comments on this article

Be the first to comment on this article

Related research

Omega-3 Foods and Beverages in the U.S., 3rd Edition

Omega-3 fatty acids are emerging as some of the most widely beneficial compounds in human health. The three omega-3 fatty acids commonly recognized in the scientific literature as having health benefits are docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoi...

Anti-counterfeiting Packaging Technologies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical and Food Industries

Descriptions of anti-counterfeiting packaging technologies and their potential applications Analyses of U.S. market trends, with data for 2009, estimates for 2010, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2015...

The Future of Nutrition Labeling for Food and Drinks in Europe: Evolving consumer needs, manufacturer and retailer strategies and market opportunities

‘The Future of Front-of-Pack Nutritional Labeling in Food and Drinks’ report aims to dispel some of the myths, compound some of the confusion and clarify many of the complications surrounding the issue of point of purchase labeling in the food and dr...

Related articles

US: Peanut butter recall expanded

A recall of Trader Joe's own-label peanut butter - which is believed to be contaminated with salmonella - has been expanded to include products on sale at other US retailers.

US: Trader Joe's peanut butter linked to salmonella outbreak

Trader Joe's has recalled its Valencia Creamy Salted Peanut Butter after it was linked to 29 salmonella cases in 18 US states.

US: Hershey modifies syrup labels on FDA concerns

Hershey has "resolved" concerns voiced by the US Food and Drink Administration that the labeling of the chocolate giant's fortified syrup products failed to meet regulatory guidelines.

Welcome to the home of food information, insight & intelligence

Not a member? Join here

Decrease font sizeDecrease font sizeDecrease font size Increase font sizeIncrease font sizeIncrease font size Comment on this article Email this to a friend Print this page