UK: Government did not act unlawfully on foot and mouth inquiry
Hopes for a full public inquiry into the UK's recent outbreak of foot and mouth disease were dashed this week. The High Court in London has ruled that a group of farmers, hoteliers and vets did not have a case to argue that the government had acted unlawfully in refusing to hold an inquiry.
The group of 13 plaintiffs said the three short inquiries into the outbreak and how it was handled were wholly inadequate and would do very little to rebuild confidence among those worst affected. The current Lessons Learned inquiry should have been full and open, they argued.
However, Lord Justice Simon Brown denied the farmers had a legal case when they argued that Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary Margaret Beckett had broken the law by not holding a full public inquiry.
"It is, to my mind, pre-eminently a political decision and one for which the government will ultimately have to answer at the ballot box," he said. He also refused the group leave to appeal.
- Does Kraft Heinz want to swallow Unilever whole?
- Focus: Nestle CEO plan to balance sales, earnings
- Comment: Meal kits in US - don't believe the hype
- Will Kellogg's DSD exit help it grow in US snacks?
- Is Mondelez's margin target hurting sales?
- Nestle plans restructuring as 2016 profit misses
- Kraft Heinz pursuing Unilever in takeover move
- General Mills issues profit warning
- Kraft Heinz returns to organic growth, ups margins
- Kraft Heinz pulls Unilever bid