Blog: Could proxy fight hit PepsiCo?
Dean Best | 17 July 2014
Nelson Peltz is not letting go. The US billionaire investor is continuing in his quest to get PepsiCo to split in two - and has reportedly suggested a proxy battle with the company could be on the horizon.
Peltz wants PepsiCo to divide its snack business from its drinks unit but, despite his public criticism of the company's performance, the Lay's crisps maker is remained steadfast in its commitment to its model.
Yesterday, Peltz made his latest pronouncements on the situation at a conference in New York convened by CNBC.
According to the news channel, Peltz said he "most definitely" wants PepsiCo to split in two and that there "could be" a proxy battle. "We have definitely not disappeared from the scene," Peltz said.
"Over the last five or six months, we've met with about 100 of the top shareholders of Pepsi. The stock has moved up dramatically. It hasn't moved up because of earnings. They had a big reset a couple of years ago and they haven't even got to the guidance they gave in '12. The company is not being managed well."
Peltz insisted PepsiCo's shares had risen because Trian's "message is resonating with the shareholders of Pepsi". He said: "And I urge you to watch this space and see what happens."
Asked to clarify, Peltz said: "There will be action." Pressed if there could be a proxy battle, the investor replied: "Could be", although when questioned if Trian would pursue a battle, he added: "No, you're hearing me answer a question that [a proxy fight] is a possibility.
The fact Peltz is still hammering away at PepsiCo over a year after first suggesting the company split in two (at that time he was calling for PepsiCo to merge with Mondelez and spin off the drinks division) indicates the investor still believes he could win enough shareholder support to put pressure on the board.
In February, analysts at Sanford Bernstein last month published a survey of 100 PepsiCo investors. Some 55% of the shareholders surveyed said the company should split.
Nevertheless, PepsiCo has so far stood firm. Weeks after that survey - and in the wake of comments from Peltz for the company to use more than "platitudes and rhetoric" to defend its position - PepsiCo insisted "sustained value creation" for its shareholders was "best optimised as an integrated food and beverage company".
Peltz, however, is not going away.
As "healthy" became the coin word of the century "frozen" was left out in the cold. But two major manufacturers in the US are looking to heat up the sector by claiming frozen food means healthy. ...
Some analysts might be breathing a sigh of relief at news Danone is rejecting speculation it is about to swoop for infant-formula giant Mead Johnson. ...
It is an unseasonably mild and bright morning here in Paris as this year's SIAL expo gets under away. Will the mood of exhibitors match the sunnier weather?...
Raisio, the Finland-based food group, is to lower the sugar content of UK cereal brand Sugar Puffs - and at the same time remove the ingredient from the product's name....
- Focus: Will Danone return to growth in dairy?
- Why Nestle is relaxed about the China "drag"
- Comment: Paying the price for eating healthily
- Focus: Why French retail deals could hit suppliers
- M&A Watch: Emmi shareholders should consider sale
- SIAL 2014: Premier in talks over US manufacturing
- Danone "eyes acquisition of Mead Johnson"
- Symington's acquires Tanfield Foods
- Heinz silent over Polish factory expansion talk
- Kellogg, Nestle slammed for "chaotic" salt policy