Blog: French protectionism
Catherine Sleep | 7 March 2006
The French government says it will protect its 20 leading companies from foreign aggressors. That’s overseas investors, to you and me. Touching, perhaps, but economically dubious. Protecting your market from inward investment runs contrary to most economists’ vision of a healthy business strategy.
Danone, Carrefour and the like do not need to be protected from Pepsi or indeed any other potential investor. They operate globally and employ an international workforce. They can run their businesses perfectly well in a free and competitive marketplace without contrived defence measures.
The immediate impact of the news of the government’s bizarre initiative was to send both companies’ share price down. Rough justice.
The BBC turned to just-food today for insight on the price dispute between Tesco and Unilever....
Just weeks after buying UK turkey processor Bernard Matthews from administration, food tycoon Ranjit Boparan has struck a similar deal....
Shares in Tyson Foods slumped on Friday, closing down almost 9% after an analyst claimed a lawsuit facing the company could hit the US meat titan....
- Analysis: Tyson's shrewd investment in Beyond Meat
- Price an underlying tension across European FMCG
- Thailand: convenience to continue to thrive
- Danone's Q3 sales - what the analysts say
- Interview: Some Foods on rise of low-FODMAP market
- Bel takes majority stake in MOM Group
- Mars launches Maltesers in the US
- Nestle lowers outlook on "softer environment"
- Unilever in continuing price spat with Musgrave
- China milk powder arrests prompt Fonterra "review"
- The Big 15: Strategies and Priorities of Top Packaged Food Players in Comparison
- Omega-3 in Food and Beverage:Time for a Reboot?
- Packaged Food: Quarterly Statement Q3 2016
- Global Food Packaging: Innovating for Greater Convenience and Quality Image
- Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review