Blog: General Mills investors vote no to ditching GMO
Hannah Abdulla | 25 September 2014
General Mills shareholders reject proposals to ditch genetically modified ingredients
Genetically modified ingredients is a hot issue, nowhere more so than in the US. Most food makers in the country, through a number of industry organisations, maintain GMOs are safe and insist their use crop cultivation carry environmental and economic benefits. But, at General Mills' shareholder meeting this week, investors in the food giant were asked to vote on whether the company should no longer use the ingredients.
The firm, which earlier this month, purchased natural and organic firm Annie's, presented investors with a proposition to ditch all genetically-modified ingredients from its entire lineup of brands. 97.8% of voters rejected the proposal.
The idea came from the shareholder Harriett Crosby, great-granddaughter of one of the company founders, who argued that GMOs harm the General Mills brand and reputation as well as posing a health risk.
CEO Ken Powell said the firm was "very aware" of the numerous regulators that had ruled GMOs to be safe, and the firm itself "believe GMOs are very safe".
But does the move really come as a surprise? General Mills has maintained a sort of on-the-fence approach when it comes to its relationship with GMO-free.
While it might have appeared to be going clean at the beginning of the year when it launched a GM-free variant of its Cheerios cereal, it did insist at the time, the move did not signal its support of the GM-free lobby that was gaining public attention in the US. It also added it had no plans to launch GM-free variants of any of the rest of its range.
But following the Annie's buy, when COO Jeff Harman celebrated the fact that the deal would see the firm expand its presence in the US branded organic and natural foods industry, this news could leave some confused about the direction General Mills is going in when it comes to GMO.
Choice, it seems, is a big factor in what General Mills believes will win customers over. Keeping its original Cheerios line alongside the GMO-free version is a prime example of this.
For now, it appears General Mills will be keeping its ranges as is. If you want clean ingredients, there's always Annie's.
The BBC turned to just-food today for insight on the price dispute between Tesco and Unilever....
Just weeks after buying UK turkey processor Bernard Matthews from administration, food tycoon Ranjit Boparan has struck a similar deal....
This week, Bel struck a deal to buy a majority stake in fellow French group MOM Brands. Another French food major, Danone, faced criticism in the US over its plans for GMO ingredients. US snack maker ...
Shares in Tyson Foods slumped on Friday, closing down almost 9% after an analyst claimed a lawsuit facing the company could hit the US meat titan....
- It won't just be Unilever to push for Brexit hikes
- Price an underlying tension across European FMCG
- Interview: UK trade body on Brexit's policy impact
- Danone's Q3 sales - what the analysts say
- Interview: UK trade body on the impact of Brexit
- Nestle lowers outlook on "softer environment"
- PepsiCo sets 2025 nutrition, sustainability goals
- China "transition" drags on Danone Q3
- UK announces "action plan" to drive food exports
- CP Foods invests in UK foodservice firm Foodfellas
- The Big 15: Strategies and Priorities of Top Packaged Food Players in Comparison
- Omega-3 in Food and Beverage:Time for a Reboot?
- Global Food Packaging: Innovating for Greater Convenience and Quality Image
- Packaged Food: Quarterly Statement Q3 2016
- Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review