Blog: Government intervention - right or wrong?
Dean Best | 22 October 2007
Obesity was back on the front pages here in the UK last week as the latest report into the state of the nation’s waistline was unveiled.
The findings won’t have surprised anyone too much – the country is getting morbidly obese, costing us millions in healthcare and our children, in particular, are at risk.
The majority of health campaigners, however, will feel disappointed that this latest investigation didn’t come packaged up with a clearer set of proposals on how to combat this crisis. The industry meanwhile will no doubt have been un-nerved by the change in emphasis in the report. Targeting individual responsibility, it basically said, had not worked and a top-down approach was needed. As I said, no particular policy options were mentioned, but my feeling was that increased regulation will be the natural outcome from these conclusions.
Far-reaching government intervention will have its critics. However, there was an example in Norway this week of a way the authorities could participate whole-heartedly in this debate without appearing draconian. The Norwegian Department of Health (DoH) has commenced legislative work to introduce a National Health Brand for food products by the end of 2008. The legislation, led by Health Minister Sylvia Brustad, will include the "broadest input from the foods industry and other interest groups" to establish a brand and brand logo. Let’s here your views on this. Can it work?
The issue of government intervention will have split the food industry in France, meanwhile, with the findings of the Attali report into the retail sector causing great controversy. Attali's suggestion that removing retail planning restrictions or legalising below-cost selling would kick-start the retail economy has been challenged by food maunfacturers.
Elsewhere, it’s been a more positive few days for the food industry. Retail sales in the UK seem to have bounced back after a poor summer. And, in order to leave you on a positive note, it's worth mentioning that despite rising costs and difficult consumer conditions at present, two of our industry’s powerhouses, Danone and Nestle, are enjoying buoyant sales.
Blue Bell Creameries is trying to win back the trust of consumers after a fatal listeriosis outbreak last year was linked to its products - but in recent days the US ice cream maker has issued another...
The UK's competition regulator has given the all-clear to Hain Celestial's bid to buy UK food and beverage group Orchard House Foods, nine months after the US group announced the deal....
Hershey made an unusual announcement today (20 September), sharing its own sales data for the last four weeks to assuage any possible investor concern over figures released by Nielsen....
As the UK starts to ponder what kind of a relationship it wants with the European Union post-Brexit, EU leaders have been lining up to warn that Britain will not be allowed to "cherry pick" deals and ...
- Interview: Mondelez eyes sweet success in China
- The benefits of engaging staff in sustainability
- How food companies involve staff in sustainability
- What next for Bernard Matthews? - comment
- Why Danone is withdrawing Dumex from Vietnam
- Fonterra says value-added strategy paying off
- Ireland unveils national plan to tackle obesity
- B&G Foods acquires ABF's US spice business
- General Mills profit falls as sales disappoint
- Bernard Matthews pensions scheme under review
- Global Chocolate Confectionery Overview: Challenges, Opportunities and Risks
- The Big 15: Strategies and Priorities of Top Packaged Food Players in Comparison
- Global Foodservice Market 2016-2020
- Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review
- Global Food and Drinks Closures: Performance and Opportunities