Blog: Helping or discriminating?
Catherine Sleep | 10 June 2004
Here in the UK it’s been one excitement after the other. Barely had we calmed down after D-Day commemoration events at the weekend, when along came Tuesday’s magnificent Venusian transit. Today we head for the polling booth to vote in both EU and local elections, and we are also preparing for excitement of a different kind as the European football championships kick off on Saturday. Yes, I mean soccer, for all my North American readers out there.
Thinking back to the last football tournament of this scale, the 2002 World Cup, many employers struggled to keep their workforce motivated. Staged in Asia, most matches were played during the European working day, prompting a not entirely unexpected wave of staff ‘sickness’. Many managers sought to turn a negative into a positive by bringing TVs into the workplace and encouraging employees to watch key matches together. They hoped that a small dent in productivity would be amply compensated for by a massive gain in popularity and a grateful workforce.
In any case they knew that, win or lose, it would all be over soon. The same cannot be said of most problems employers face today, and our current Feature of the Week addresses one of the latest to emerge. To what extent are companies responsible for employee obesity?
Increasingly, employers are taking a stance to help staff shed the pounds. All-you-can-eat food bars in the staff canteen are out; nutritional counselling is in. And it’s not purely altruistic; with average annual US healthcare costs estimated at US$7000 per employee, fat is very much a financial issue. It’s also a Human Resources minefield: when does active encouragement to get fit and eat healthily become sizeist discrimination inviting harassment litigation?
The BBC turned to just-food today for insight on the price dispute between Tesco and Unilever....
Just weeks after buying UK turkey processor Bernard Matthews from administration, food tycoon Ranjit Boparan has struck a similar deal....
Shares in Tyson Foods slumped on Friday, closing down almost 9% after an analyst claimed a lawsuit facing the company could hit the US meat titan....
- Analysis: Tyson's shrewd investment in Beyond Meat
- Price an underlying tension across European FMCG
- Thailand: convenience to continue to thrive
- Danone's Q3 sales - what the analysts say
- Interview: Some Foods on rise of low-FODMAP market
- Bel takes majority stake in MOM Group
- Mars launches Maltesers in the US
- Unilever in continuing price spat with Musgrave
- Nestle lowers outlook on "softer environment"
- China milk powder arrests prompt Fonterra "review"
- The Big 15: Strategies and Priorities of Top Packaged Food Players in Comparison
- Omega-3 in Food and Beverage:Time for a Reboot?
- Packaged Food: Quarterly Statement Q3 2016
- Global Food Packaging: Innovating for Greater Convenience and Quality Image
- Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review