Blog: Is a fat tax fair?
Michelle Russell | 3 June 2010
The chief executive of Sainsbury’s Justin King last week cautioned that a ‘fat tax’ might be applied to some food products by the new coalition government in the next budget, as it looks to cut mounting debt.
The issue is one that has raged on for some time, both in the UK and overseas.
The IMF has suggested that one of the most effective ways for the UK coalition government to raise cash would be to remove the zero-rate of tax on food and other items.
"There is substantial scope for improving the revenue performance of the VAT in almost all countries, including by eliminating exemptions and reduced rates,” the IMF argued.
At present, VAT is already levied on some crisps, snacks and confectionery in the UK and, while some believe that extra taxes on such products would have a beneficial impact on health problems such as obesity, many others do not.
King believes a move to increase tax would be “regressive” and “bizarre”, dismissing the idea that it would tackle the problem of childhood obesity and claiming it would hit poorer families the hardest.
The UK's Food and Drink Federation has indicated that it too is opposed to such a move.
Julian Hunt, the FDF director of communications, told just-food that, while good for grabbing headlines, there is no evidence to suggest that such ‘fat taxes’ would actually work in reality.
“Many experts feel that such a taxation policy would have no effect on obesity, would hit lower income groups hardest and would be a bureaucratic nightmare to administer,” Hunt said.
“We already pay VAT on many of the food and drink items that consumer love – so introducing further, regressive taxes on such products would result only in lighter wallets, not smaller waists.”
And it seems the UK is not alone in its distaste for the tax. A survey in the US published today showed that more than half of Americans oppose a 'fat tax' on soft drinks and fast food.
The survey by Harris Interactive found that 56% are opposed to the tax, with two in five "strongly opposed".
This may explain the US government's attempt at what could be seen as a considered but long-term solution to tackling childhood obesity.
Earlier this month, US First Lady Michelle Obama unveiled a Task Force action plan calling on food manufacturers to curb the marketing of unhealthy foods to children.
The report sets out recommendations for increasing physical activity, providing healthy foods in schools and increasing nutritional knowledge for parents.
A tax that may cost jobs and reduce consumer spending could be very unpopular indeed. Maybe the US has the right idea. Education on healthy eating certainly seems key.
Since Theresa May took over as UK Prime Minister in the wake of the country's referendum vote to quit the European Union, she and her ministers have been at pains not to divulge their negotiating posi...
Greenpeace's long-running campaign against UK tuna brand John West, owned by seafood giant Thai Union, is now directing its fire against Sainsbury's....
The Obama administration appears to have conceded the landmark Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal will not be pushed through in the lame-duck session of Congress before Donald Trump is inaugur...
- Unilever 2016 investor day - the top takeaways
- The key questions for digital strategists in 2017
- Have food promotions reached tipping point?
- Mondelez goes beyond certified cocoa - analysis
- ABF on Brexit, M&A and grocery - interview
- Nestle unveils process to cut sugar by 40%
- Unilever focuses on "value" of spreads arm
- Japan's Nagatanien buys Chaucer Food Group
- Unilever sets new margin target with help from ZBB
- B&G acquires pasta sauce group Victoria Fine Foods