Blog: Wal-Mart's court win won't end gender discrimination accusations
Petah Marian | 21 June 2011
Wal-Mart Stores has won in an appeal to the US Supreme Court preventing a group of women from filing a class action lawsuit accusing it of a nationwide policy that led to gender discrimination.
While the class action may have faltered, lawyers for the women have said they plan to continue to fight through a number of lower courts and through the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The court prevented a group of six female Wal-Mart employees from forming a class action to sue the world's largest retailer for allegedly practising broad discrimination in its pay and promotional decisions.
The Impact Fund, a group representing the the women, said that the Supreme Court's decision addressed only whether a nationwide class action could go forward. "It did not rule on whether Wal-Mart discriminated against women, nor whether you may pursue an individual claim of sex discrimination," the group said.
Wal-Mart saw the decision as a victory. The retailer said it was "pleased" with the ruling and believes the "court made the right decision".
"The court today unanimously rejected class certification and, as the majority made clear, the plaintiffs' claims were worlds away from showing a companywide discriminatory pay and promotion policy," said Wal-Mart.
If the case had been allowed to go ahead, it would have covered all female workers at the retailer since 1998 and could have cost the company billions if it lost.
However, in a statement on the class action's website, lawyers for the women said that the ruling still allows women whose claims go back to 26 December 1998 to file charges with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or bring their claims in court.
"Class counsel has planned for various outcomes before the Supreme Court - including this one - and have put in place plans to assist as many women Wal-Mart class members as possible with their claims," the attorneys said.
In an interview with Bloomberg, attorney Joseph Sellers of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll said the group "began weeks ago preparing thousands of charges to be filed with the EEOC [US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission]".
He said that lawyers will try to pursue some "more narrowly drawn, tailored classes" and that it will end up with "multiple cases where Wal-Mart's practices are being challenged."
It seems that the fight, for some of these women at least, is not yet over.
The BBC turned to just-food today for insight on the price dispute between Tesco and Unilever....
Just weeks after buying UK turkey processor Bernard Matthews from administration, food tycoon Ranjit Boparan has struck a similar deal....
Shares in Tyson Foods slumped on Friday, closing down almost 9% after an analyst claimed a lawsuit facing the company could hit the US meat titan....
- Analysis: Tyson's shrewd investment in Beyond Meat
- Price an underlying tension across European FMCG
- Danone's Q3 sales - what the analysts say
- Interview: Some Foods on rise of low-FODMAP market
- Thailand: convenience to continue to thrive
- Bel takes majority stake in MOM Group
- Mars launches Maltesers in the US
- Nestle lowers outlook on "softer environment"
- Unilever in continuing price spat with Musgrave
- China milk powder arrests prompt Fonterra "review"
- The Big 15: Strategies and Priorities of Top Packaged Food Players in Comparison
- Omega-3 in Food and Beverage:Time for a Reboot?
- Packaged Food: Quarterly Statement Q3 2016
- Global Food Packaging: Innovating for Greater Convenience and Quality Image
- Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review