Blog: Andy CoyneFood firms in the firing line in UK government's anti-obesity fight

Andy Coyne | 30 May 2018

The UK has a weight problem.

The UK has a weight problem.

UK manufacturers of food products containing high levels of sugar can't expect the government's focus to turn away from them anytime soon.

At the weekend the Sunday Times newspaper reported that it had seen a draft of proposals which showed the UK government is planning to introduce a raft of tough anti-obesity measures.

These included the banning of unhealthy snacks at tills and checkouts in shops, stopping the TV advertising of junk-food before the 9pm watershed and introducing a sugar tax on milk-based drinks by 2020.

Now an influential committee of MPs, in an inquiry into childhood obesity, has suggested that "brand-generated characters or licensed TV and film characters" such as Tony the Tiger and the Honey Monster should be banned from promoting sugary products (breakfast cereals in their case).

The UK Parliament's Health and Social Care Select Committee has heard from campaigners such as celebrity chef Jamie Oliver who opined that cartoons and superheroes should not be used to "peddle rubbish".

With official figures suggesting a third of UK children are overweight or obese by the time they leave primary school, this is not an issue that is going to go away and, in defending the health of vulnerable children, tough talk, followed by action, may seem to be an easy win for a government embattled on many other fronts.

Other initiatives it may well pursue include giving local authorities more powers to limit the proliferation of unhealthy food outlets in their areas and limiting junk food and drink billboard advertising near schools.

A recent report from Public Health England showed that the food industry had failed to meet a sugar reduction target set by the government.

Retailers, manufacturers, restaurants, cafes and pub chains were told to cut 5% of sugar by August 2017. But the report showed that food manufacturers and supermarkets only cut out 2% over the first 12 months of the sugar-reduction programme.

If the Sunday Times story is right - and it certainly seems to chime with the noises coming out of the select committee - the government would appear to have lost patience with allowing the industry to police itself and failing to make an impact.

Food manufacturers can expect it to start playing hardball with their product contents and the way they are marketed.


If Kraft Heinz passed on Pinnacle, it should do so with Campbell

It's almost 18 months since Unilever rebuffed Kraft Heinz and, ever since, the rumour mill has spun over where the US manufacturer could look next. It's been reported today (2 August) the ketchup make...


Maybe Trump is finding trade wars aren’t so easy to win

In March, a day after issuing stiff tariffs on imports of steel and aluminium, Donald Trump took to Twitter to give his verdict on trade disputes. Four months later, it looks as though Trump's confide...


Upfield Foods, home to ex-Unilever spreads assets, makes notable appointment

UK food-industry veteran David Salkeld is to take a senior position at Upfield Foods, the newly-instituted business that is home to Unilever's former spreads assets....


Nature's Path quits US organic trade body in "protest"

The Organic Trade Association, which represents the organic industry in the US, has seen a high-profile member quit the organisation, taking a swipe at the body's stance on policy issues....

Forgot your password?