Tate & Lyle has said that it remains confident in its sucralose business despite the loss of its patent infringement case in the US.
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
A spokesperson for Tate & Lyle told just-food today (23 September) that the company believes it still holds a number of competitive advantages in the sucralose market, including superior technology and hygiene, years of experience in the market, the strength of the Splenda brand and good long-term relationships with key customers.
“Intellectual property is just one of a number of different layers of protection which define Tate & Lyle’s formidable competitive advantage in the global sucralose business,” Karl Kramer, president, Tate & Lyle Sucralose added.
Tate & Lyle declined to quantify the impact of the ruling on the Splenda business. However, Cazenove analyst Polly Barclay said that she does not expect the decision to have a near-term impact.
“It is disappointing news for Tate,” she wrote in an investor note. “While this news has no impact on our near-term forecasts, it once again highlights the risk of generic sucralose.”

US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalData