The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has played down the second resignation of a member of its steering group set up to gauge the public mood on GM food.
Leading academic Professor Brian Wynne, the vice-chair of the 11-person public consultation body, resigned just eight days after Dr. Helen Wallace, director of the thinktank GeneWatch UK, left the group.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
Wynne abandoned his role in protest at the use of taxpayers’ money to promote “propaganda” in favour of genetically modified food, according to the Daily Telegraph.
Dr. Wallace is understood to have left in protest at the FSA’s links with the agri-chemical industry, which has been lobbying strongly to allow GM foods to be used more widely.
However, the FSA today (2 June) said that at a meeting last week, the steering group affirmed its commitment to holding a “well-balanced” dialogue with members of the public about the issues surrounding food produced using GM.
“The issues surrounding this topic are important to the future of agriculture and food production,” a spokesperson for the FSA said. “Meanwhile, everyone has to assess the risks and benefits of the food they choose to eat. Consequently, the steering group believes it is important that members of the public are given the opportunity to participate in a dialogue in which the views and arguments expressed by a wide variety of stakeholders are aired and discussed.”
The FSA said the dialogue should not presume any particular outcome, and should be undertaken with a view to helping ensure that the “issues, concerns and aspirations” that the public have with respect to the use of GM in the production of food are “identified and recognised” in future policy.
However, in a letter to FSA chair Lord Rooker following Dr. Wallace’s resignation, organic food body The Soil Association urged the agency to “stop wasting public money”.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalData“I think most people could never understand why the last government asked the FSA to carry out what many of us believed was intended to be a pro-GM propaganda exercise, pursuing one of Tony Blair’s obsessions, and costing a large amount of public money,” Soil Association policy director Peter Melchett wrote.
“Given Dr Wallace’s resignation, and the current economic climate, it would be unthinkable for the agency to continue to waste public money on this exercise.”
He urged the agency to end the GM consultation, “in the interests of saving some public money”.
