The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) has expressed disappointment at this week’s decision by the EU to impose stricter labelling requirements on genetically modified foods.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
The move was described by the AFBF as “a slap in the face to American agriculture”.
“It appears the European Union wants to declare economic war on American agriculture,” said AFBF President Bob Stallman. “The proposal threatens billions of dollars worth of US farm exports,” he asserted.
In addition to labelling, the Parliament adopted provisions that would impose product-specific traceability requirements, which Stallman said, “would make it all but impossible to export bulk commodities to Europe.”
About 75% of the world’s GM crops are planted in the US, Stallman noted. And a large percentage of major export crops, such as corn, cotton and soybeans, now come from biotech varieties, and these crops account for a large share of the US’ annual US$6.3bn worth of farm exports to the European Union.
US Tariffs are shifting - will you react or anticipate?
Don’t let policy changes catch you off guard. Stay proactive with real-time data and expert analysis.
By GlobalDataThe European proposal, Stallman charged, “clearly seeks to protect Europe’s domestic products.” The Parliament rejected a proposal to label meat and milk from animals that are fed biotech-derived feed, he noted.
Stallman said the proposal, which still has to be approved by EU environment ministers, “has no scientific basis” and is “far worse” that what was originally proposed. The proposal is aimed at ending a four-year moratorium on approval of biotech crops in Europe. However, the proposed threshold for labelling is twice as strict as current rules (1% versus the proposed 0.5%).
“In recent years, the European Commission, the British government, and European scientists and regulators have all said there is no scientific reason for labelling biotech products,” Stallman said. “Today’s action is a repudiation of careful scientific deliberation in Europe, which has generally agreed with our government’s findings that these products are safe.”
In response to today’s action, the farm leader said his organisation will be working with the Bush administration “to ensure our concerns are voiced loud and clear to the European Union and our government takes appropriate action if the European proposal is enacted.”
To see more news on the EU vote on GM labelling, click here.
