US meat company Tyson Foods has started an internal review after claims by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) about animal welfare issues at the company’s Heflin, Alabama, poultry plant.


“We’re concerned about some of the actions shown in PETA’s carefully-edited video,” Tyson said. “While the video appears to have been shot in our Heflin, Alabama, plant we don’t know all of the circumstances involved. That’s why we’ve initiated our own internal review. To the extent this review determines any deficiencies in our procedures or practices; we will immediately undertake corrective action.”


The review is being conducted by Dr. Kelley Pfalzgraf, a veterinarian who manages Tyson’s Office of Animal Well-Being. He has more than 30 years of experience in the livestock industry and has received training from Dr. Temple Grandin, an animal welfare expert who has conducted audits at a number of Tyson plants. The company is inviting Dr Grandin to join Dr Pfalzgraf in reviewing plant operations at Heflin, .


After seeing the PETA video and an initial check of operations at Heflin, Tyson made the following observations:


“PETA’s agent was apparently employed at the plant in the poultry slaughter area and in all likelihood violated our animal welfare policy,” it said. “He signed a document confirming he went through the company’s animal welfare training and was responsible for ensuring that no birds remained alive. His job gave him the responsibility to process any live birds, stop the line or sound an alarm if there was a problem. Instead, it appears PETA’s agent violated Tyson’s animal welfare policy by allowing some conscious birds to go into the scald tank for the sole purpose of videotaping what he should have been preventing.”

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

“We also take issue with PETA claims of manual decapitation of live birds,” it said. “We believe the carefully edited video is showing birds that have already been cut by an automatic knife and are either dead or have been rendered unconscious. The worker shown removing heads by hand was monitoring the effectiveness of the previous automatic knife process.”


“We take animal welfare very seriously,” Tyson said. “For example, we conduct internal animal welfare audits in our plants and are also subject to regular third party audits. We train our workers on proper animal handling practices. In fact, workers who do not follow company policy in this area are subject to disciplinary action. This includes the possibility of discharge from the company.”


“Our company continues to research controlled atmosphere stunning,” it said. “While we continue to examine this technology, animal well-being experts are divided over whether it is more humane than the process virtually all other companies in the industry, including Tyson Foods, currently have in place.”


“While PETA claims to be interested in animal welfare and controlled atmosphere stunning, the organization’s rhetoric and website clearly focus on a vegetarian agenda,” it said.


“Tyson Foods has long been committed to animal well-being and has had formal programs in place for some time,” Tyson said. “In fact, Tyson was the first US poultry company to establish an Office of Animal Well-Being.”