Mars appears to have lost a long legal battle to claim EU trademark rights to the colour and form of its Bounty chocolate bar.


The European Court of Justice’ (ECJ) Court of First Instance has rejected an appeal by the food company against the EU’s Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) refusal of registration.


It and German confectioner Ludwig Schokolade argued that the actual chocolate bar itself lacked sufficient “distinctive character” to be trademarked. The court said Mars had not supplied “the required evidence [backing] its argument.”


The case has run since 1998, and will be a legal precedent. Mars claimed that the rounded ends to the elongated rectangular chocolate Bounty bars and its standard three arrows or chevrons on the top “are features which significantly depart from the norms and customs of the relevant sector”.


However, the court ruled that “the average consumer…will perceive those chevrons, at the most, as decorative elements and not as a sign indicating the commercial origin of the product”.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

It added that Mars had not proved a similar claim regarding “the rounded ends…”