Germany’s competition watchdog has claimed retail giant Edeka “crossed a line” in its dealings with suppliers in the wake of its acquisition of Tengelmann’s Plus stores in 2009.

After Edeka acquired the Plus outlets, it “demanded special conditions” from 500 suppliers across its business that constituted an “abuse” of its position, the Bundeskartellamt said.

In its initial report of its findings, the competition watchdog claimed Edeka had demanded “better purchase conditions” that had been granted to Plus be introduced across its entire business. Edeka also wanted longer payment periods that had been agreed with Plus in some cases.

The watchdog also claimed suppliers were asked to pay items including “synergy bonus”, “partnership compensation” or “bonus for product range expansion”.

A spokesperson for the regulator, which first raided Edeka’s offices over the claims in 2009, will not fine the retailer but will seek to lay down which practices were unlawful.

The Bundeskartellamt has given Edeka until 20 September to comment before issuing its final ruling.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

An Edeka spokesperson said: “We don’t comment on this matter due to current proceedings.”