The UK subsidiary of rival chocolate manufacturers Nestlé and Mars were at London’s High Court yesterday [Wednesday] arguing over Nestlé’s fight to register the phrase “Have a break” as a trademark.


Nestlé, which makes the KitKat chocolate bar, wants to have the phrase recognised as a registered trademark to prevent rivals from making a chocolate bar called “Break” or “Have a break” that might lead consumers to think that the new bar is related to KitKat.


Nestlé’s first attempt to register the phrase was turned down in May, despite the fact that Nestlé’s phrase “Have a break – Have a KitKat” is already registered as a trademark following a long-running advertising campaign. Nestlé is now appealing against the outcome of their previous attempt.


Nestlé claims that a substantial number of members of the public replied: “Have a KitKat” when prompted with the phrase “Have a break”.


Mars, Nestlé’s rival in the chocolate market, has opposed the application for registration, reported the Evening Standard.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

As the judge rose for the lunchtime recess, he joked: “I won’t suggest we have a break but I will suggest we adjourn.”


The case continues.