Amid opposition from shareholders, dual-listed Unilever has abandoned a plan to move its headquarters to the Netherlands under a restructuring exercise that would have incorporated the Anglo-Dutch consumer goods giant into a single legal entity outside of London.

In March, the maker of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and Hellmann’s mayonnaise announced it planned to shift its HQ to Rotterdam.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

At the time, Unilever said its decision was based on the fact 55% of its combined ordinary shares were owned by the Netherlands’ operation. Unilever has been owned through two separately-listed companies, a Dutch N.V. and a UK plc, since its formation in 1930. Still, it said then some of its operations would continue to be based in the UK capital and it would maintain listings in London, Amsterdam and New York. 

However, investors in the UK were against the plan on concerns they would have to sell their shares listed on the FTSE-100. As a consequence, Unilever said in a statement today (5 October) the “proposal has not received support from a significant group of shareholders and therefore consider it appropriate to withdraw”.

But the company did say today it had received “widespread support for the principle behind simplification”.

Chairman Marijn Dekkers said: “Unilever has built a long track record of consistent and competitive performance. The board continues to believe that simplifying our dual-headed structure would, over time, provide opportunities to further accelerate value creation and serve the best long-term interests of Unilever.

“The board will now consider its next steps and will continue to engage with our shareholders. We will proceed with the plan to cancel the NV preference shares, further strengthening our corporate governance.”

The decision announced in March was seen by some as a backlash to the UK’s decision to leave the European Union. And now it is unclear what other options are open to Unilever if some investors favour the simplification process.

“We recognise the proposal has not received support from a significant group of shareholders and therefore consider it appropriate to withdraw,” according to today’s statement.

An analysis from just-food in March, revealed M&A might be the bigger reason for Unilever to consider leaving London rather than Brexit.