Casino has taken a swipe at Carrefour in the ongoing dispute over the future of Brazilian retailer CBD and insisted its French rival had acted in a “hostile” manner.

Earlier today (5 July), Carrefour, which is looking to merge its operations in Brazil with CBD, claimed it harboured “no hostile intentions” against Casino.

Carrefour has backed a plan, put forward by Brazilian investment fund Gama, to combine its local assets with CBD, the country’s largest retailer.

However, Casino, which is a co-owner of CBD, has attacked the plan as “illegal”. It has also lodged two requests for arbitration with its fellow CBD shareholder Abilio Diniz, which held talks with Carrefour over the proposal and supports the plan.

Casino claims a 2005 deal with Diniz means it owns the right to become the sole controlling shareholder in CBD, also known through its trading name of Grupo Pao de Acucar, next year.

In response to Carrefour’s statement today, Casino claimed its rival’s “secret talks” pointed to its “hostile” intentions.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

“Carrefour’s hostile attitude is made plain by the fact that Carrefour conducted secret talks for months to capture control of CBD,” Casino said. “If Carrefour had no hostile intention towards Casino, it would have clearly informed Casino – as the largest shareholder in CBD, exacting joint control of the company – of its project.”

Casino has consistently argued that a 2006 agreement with Diniz means that it has to agree to – and be involved in – any discussions over the future of CBD. By holding talks with Carrefour, Diniz has broken the deal, Casino has argued, prompting it to seek arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce.

Diniz said last week that he was “convinced” that his negotiations with Carrefour had “taken place in a legitimate manner, in accordance with Brazilian law, our shareholder accords and the principles of trade ethics”.

Carrefour appeared today to support Diniz and question Casino’s claims of the veracity of the shareholder agreements.

“Publicly-available agreements between Casino and the Diniz Group relating to CBD and its controlling shareholder Wilkes do not contain, to our knowledge, any provision prohibiting discussions or negotiations and to date Casino has not referred to any specific clause to support its assertions,” Carrefour said.

Casino, however, disagreed. “The letter and the spirit of the public agreements concluded by Casino and the Diniz Group prohibit such negotiations and Casino is confident the courts will confirm this.”

The Brazilian National Development Bank, which has said it would part-fund the controversial merger, reportedly said yesterday that it would only back the deal if Casino supported the transaction.