Kraft Foods’ takeover bid for Cadbury has attracted a mixed response from industry watchers with some urging the companies to come together and others questioning the US food giant’s M&A record.


Cadbury, the maker of Dairy Milk and Trident gum, has rejected the cash-and-share approach from Kraft, which has valued the UK confectioner at GBP10.2bn (US$16.73bn).


Kraft chairman and CEO Irene Rosenfeld insisted her company would be able to build on Cadbury’s recent work in boosting margins and improving efficiency. She also claimed Kraft would be able to allow Cadbury’s Somerdale production facility, which is set to close, to remain open.


Rosenfeld asserted that Kraft’s “global scope and scale” and “array” of processing and technological expertise would help build upon “Cadbury’s iconic brands”.


However, not all industry watchers are convinced about the merits of the proposed deal.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

“Arguably, if the bid suceeds, the ensuing integration of two distinct cultures will create profound disruption and provide Nestle and others with a competitive advantage,” independent analyst James Amoroso said. “In the worst case, it may cause irreparable damage to the Cadbury business and thus be the best thing that ever happened to the competition. This bid has industrial and strategic logic going for it but it demonstrates extreme cultural insensitivity.”


However, Andrew Wood, analyst at Sanford Bernstein, urged the companies to join forces and said the investment bank had flagged a potential coming together of Cadbury and Kraft as early as 2007, after the merger of Mars and gum maker Wrigley.


“We think it makes perfect sense for Kraft to acquire Cadbury and they should do it – subject to the right price for both parties,” Wood said.


He added that, based on Kraft’s initial offer, Cadbury is valued at 12x 2009 consensus EBITDA. Wood said that Mars paid 19.5x EBITDA for Wrigley and claimed Cadbury deserved a higher premium.


“The 31% premium to Friday’s close might seem attractive, but we think Cadbury can get much more. Arguably Cadbury has much more profit growth potential than Wrigley had at that time.”


Shares in Cadbury soared this morning (7 September), leaping almost 38% to 783p.