Dawn Samperisi has been awarded US$3.5m by a Manhattan jury after her right hand was burned by steam and coffee from a Starbucks espresso machine.


The Long Island woman was burned on 25 February 1999, when she asked to see an espresso machine she was considering buying as a gift. An employee at the Glen Cove Starbucks coffee shop offered to demonstrate the machine, but steam caused it to blow apart, and scald Samperisi’s hand.


She suffered first- and second-degree burns resulting in reflex sympathetic dystrophy, a nervous system disorder that rendered her hand virtually useless.


“She has a clawed, ugly, horrible, painful hand, and she’s going to have it for the rest of her life,” her lawyer, Seth Harris, told the state Supreme Court jury of six women yesterday [Monday]. He alleged that the accident would not have happened had Starbucks not been negligent in instructing its employees how to use the espresso machine.


Ray Slattery, Starbucks’ lawyer, told the jury however that Samperisi “is just as responsible for the accident as Starbucks is”.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

The jury actually awarded Samperisi US$4.6m but held her 25% liable for the accident and thus reduced the amount she actually received.